Bug 2140 - Allow specification of SlimServer address by DNS Name
: Allow specification of SlimServer address by DNS Name
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: SqueezePlay
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Settings
: unspecified
: PC Windows XP
: -- enhancement with 37 votes (vote)
: Future
Assigned To: Unassigned bug - please assign me!
:
Depends on: 9152
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-09-16 18:09 UTC by Todd Agulnick
Modified: 2013-05-01 12:24 UTC (History)
17 users (show)

See Also:
Category: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Todd Agulnick 2005-09-16 18:09:50 UTC
To allow streaming over the internet from a SlimServer that is addressed via a
dynamic DNS address, it would be handy to be able to identify a SlimServer via a
DNS name; the current implementation of the SB2 firmware allows specification
only by IP address.

Another customer requested this feature a year ago, but was deferred because the
SB2 firmware didn't have a DNS client implementation. With the recent deployment
of SqueezeNetwork, SB2 firmware presumably does implement a DNS client. So can
you now enable specification of SlimServer via DNS name?

Thanks!
Comment 1 Blackketter Dean 2005-09-16 19:25:56 UTC
Yes, this is far more possible now.  Not going to make it for 6.2, but will address as soon as possible 
after.  Thanks.
Comment 2 Ben Gladstone 2005-11-07 01:25:19 UTC
this will also help the admin of a squeezebox network across multiple sites - currently you have to update each client when you move the server, but DNS name addressing would avoid this
Comment 3 Nikhil Phadke 2008-03-23 20:55:26 UTC
This feature would be very useful across the entire SD/Logitech range, from the SB3 to the Transporter and the Duet. Should also be implemented in the Jive/SqueezePlay application.
Comment 4 Blackketter Dean 2008-03-24 08:27:57 UTC
This isn't going to be feasible in SB2/3, but we should add it for SBC/Duet.
Comment 5 Jim McAtee 2008-03-24 08:33:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> This isn't going to be feasible in SB2/3

Why not?
Comment 6 Nikhil Phadke 2008-03-26 21:38:11 UTC
Since the SB2/3 can find SqueezeNetwork, how about using SN as an intermediary to connecting to a SqueezeCenter who's IP needs to be resolved through DynamicDNS or some other similar service?
Comment 7 Jim McAtee 2008-03-27 02:05:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Since the SB2/3 can find SqueezeNetwork, how about using SN as an intermediary
> to connecting to a SqueezeCenter who's IP needs to be resolved through
> DynamicDNS or some other similar service?

I must be missing something here.

If the SB2/3 is capable of resolving host names such as those used for SqueezeNetwork and URLs of radio stations and whatnot, why can't it also use this capability to resolve the IP address of a SqueezeCenter server?

Comment 8 Richard Titmuss 2008-07-24 05:10:48 UTC
punting to 7.3
Comment 9 Nikhil Phadke 2008-10-02 00:40:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> punting to 7.3
> 

so is this happening in 7.3?
Comment 10 David Wilson 2008-10-02 01:18:25 UTC
In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > punting to 7.3
> > 
> so is this happening in 7.3?

I sure hope so.. I have 3 remote devices now and it's a p.i.t.a. having to manually reset the IP address every time my ISP changes my WAN address.  If remote playing was easier to setup, Logitech might actually sell more players.  Surely this is a further step towards consumerisation of Slim software?
Comment 11 James Richardson 2008-10-17 14:40:59 UTC
Felix/Andy: care to update/comment on this?  Felix would you be the proper person to assign this too?
Comment 12 Blackketter Dean 2008-10-17 15:55:05 UTC
I like the idea of SN providing redirection across the internet to other SC instances.  Those SC instances are already talking to SN.

This is going to be prohibitively difficult to do on the player UI, I suspect, so let's push it to the computers and internet.
Comment 13 Andy Grundman 2008-10-17 16:30:25 UTC
Yeah this is an SN thing.  See bug 9152.
Comment 14 Björn 2009-01-12 23:53:54 UTC
Some years ago I asked/suggested in a different context (that I unfortunately now don't remember where) that remote SBs (= outside own LAN) would get a resampled stream.

If/when the feature of this registered bug/FR is addressed, it would be nice to be able define max quality of the stream per player. Oh, and it brings up the question of having multiple, passworded, user accounts on the SqueezeCenter, IMO :).

Rgds,

björn
Comment 15 Nikhil Phadke 2009-02-01 18:31:17 UTC
bump .... still looking forward to the Duet (and SqueezePlay) supporting DNS by name as against number. I use my SBs across 2 homes, and unfortunately my SC 7.3 instance is located at the residence where the IP changes frequently. It has become quite painful to go lookup the IP from the DynDNS name on a computer before it can be entered into the controller. Perhaps a Lua applet that can do a DNS lookup might be a nice intermediate tool - at least the IP can be determined without having to rush to a computer.
Comment 16 Blackketter Dean 2009-02-01 18:56:52 UTC
Looking back at this as a Controller bug, I'm thinking we should just fix this on the controller/squeezeplay and let the user enter a domain name or IP address on the device.  This should be an easy kill on that device, right, and require no SN infrastructure changes, right Andy and Ben?
Comment 17 Ben Klaas 2009-02-16 14:45:43 UTC
*** Bug 11107 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18 David Wilson 2009-02-20 17:22:30 UTC
Hey guys - it's been 3.5 years on the 'todo' list.  It seems like you know how to maybe do this - is the 'target' of 7.4 real or just a way to slip it down the priority list.  My ISP is changing my WAN IP daily - I'm considering buying an ipod / dock solution to replace the 'never-working' SB3 in my work appartment if there really is no chance to get this.

One other observation - running 7.2, if the player is connected to SN I can see it from the web UI (via SN), and I can select it to connect it to SqueezeCentre, but if the IP of SC has changed since the last time it was connected then the connection attempt fails (and loses all connectivity to SN too).
Comment 19 Chris Johnson 2009-03-23 13:02:21 UTC
*** Bug 10626 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 20 Nikhil Phadke 2009-06-15 00:14:38 UTC
bump ... has this fallen off the radar?
Comment 21 Blackketter Dean 2009-07-22 08:23:25 UTC
Moving to the product SqueezePlay because this bug appears to apply to any player based on that application code.  Feel free to move it back if it's specific to the original product.
Comment 22 Richard Titmuss 2009-07-27 01:12:54 UTC
Reset priority before triage.
Comment 23 Ben Klaas 2009-08-26 07:49:29 UTC
this is an administrative shuffle on priority fields to help make better judgment on the top end of the priority list. P4->P5, P3->P4, and P2->P3.
Comment 24 Mikkel Herold 2009-09-17 12:35:10 UTC
Just another bump - it seems incredible that this issue hasn't been adressed yet. 

With the Duet out and more new products (Touch and Radio) on the way, the number of people going for a NAS/SC/Logitech Device setup will most probably increase, and this is the kind of bug that can render it less useful.

Softsqueeze accepts domain names, so SqueezePlay and the other applications should do it too.
Comment 25 Wadzinski Tom 2009-10-03 13:04:35 UTC
*** Bug 11406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 26 Chris Owens 2010-02-25 11:12:09 UTC
Tom Wadzinski is no longer available to us.  We'll have to consider what to do with this bug.
Comment 27 doser 2010-03-14 12:15:50 UTC
Bump again. This would be far more useful than entering IP addresses.
Comment 28 Dennis Mutsaers 2010-04-17 08:21:08 UTC
If Tom Wadzinski is no longer available, someone else should take over his tasks, shouldn't it?
Comment 29 localhorst 2010-04-24 03:36:54 UTC
+1, I really would love to see this feature implemented. Many people are working with DDNS services. 
At least a tweak should be available.
Comment 30 doser 2010-05-03 17:55:35 UTC
If I put together a patch, will you guys consider accepting it? Do you guys accept changes from outside developers? The one thing I wouldn't be able to provide is the translations for any additional strings I might add. I'm playing with this in 7.5 to see how it goes.
Comment 31 Mike Walsh 2010-05-03 19:36:23 UTC
i'm not offical in any way, but they do accept patches from outside devs.

just upload the code changes to this bug.  you might have to "bug" em a bit tho to get them to actually include/verify the patch.  posting in the dev section in the forum helps.
Comment 32 Adam Slim 2010-09-26 10:31:43 UTC
I seem to have missed this bug's 5th birthday.  It doesn't seem terribly complicated but would be very useful for me to get it fixed - it would get over some sundry network issues.  Pretty please?
Comment 33 Dennis Mutsaers 2011-08-02 11:42:37 UTC
Will someone please add this feature?
Comment 34 Dennis Mutsaers 2011-08-18 23:03:53 UTC
Also, is the 'Depends on' still correct? Squeezeboxes do have a DNS client nowadays...
Comment 35 Mat 2011-09-21 17:00:10 UTC
Wow.

Users are still unable to listen to music remotely unless they hard-code an IP address into their player?

The ancient SoftSqueeze (er, was that back in 2004?!) can add a server by DNS name, why can't SqueezePlay? Ridiculous!

It's not exactly difficult to resolve a DNS name to an IP address now is it?

Rant aside, *please* implement this.
Comment 36 Alan Young 2011-11-06 23:23:56 UTC
Unassigned bugs cannot have a priority.
Comment 37 Mikael Nyberg 2011-12-10 03:25:53 UTC
(In reply to comment #36)
> Unassigned bugs cannot have a priority.

perhaps assigning it ? it's on it's 6 year now....
Comment 38 Michael Herger 2012-03-12 23:27:21 UTC
This won't happen for ip3k. But the same request applies for newer players. See bug 17705.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 17705 ***
Comment 39 Michael Herger 2012-03-12 23:28:31 UTC
Oops... this has been changed to cover SP too.
Comment 40 Michael Herger 2012-03-12 23:28:48 UTC
*** Bug 17705 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 41 Michael Herger 2012-03-12 23:39:19 UTC
*** Bug 15990 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 42 Dennis Mutsaers 2012-03-12 23:58:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #39)
> Oops... this has been changed to cover SP too.

That happens when bugs haven't been resolved in 7 years...
Comment 43 jpeters_73 2012-05-22 03:27:50 UTC
It would also be helpful if this would work on the controller as well.

I'm using my Squeezebox classic to play music from my server that is 1000 KM away, it works perfect, only not if m
y provider changes my padres. (once a month)

Please make this work.