Bug 10658 - DHCP host name should be same as player name
: DHCP host name should be same as player name
Status: REOPENED
Product: SqueezePlay
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Networking
: unspecified
: PC Other
: P5 normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Felix Mueller
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-01-12 07:43 UTC by Blackketter Dean
Modified: 2011-01-14 00:41 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Category: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Blackketter Dean 2009-01-12 07:43:40 UTC
 
Comment 1 Blackketter Dean 2009-03-25 15:37:35 UTC
Felix: is this doable for MP?
Comment 2 Richard Titmuss 2009-03-26 03:07:25 UTC
It will at least be easy to make it SqueezeboxTouch, by customizing /etc/hostname for fab4 in the poky build.
Comment 3 Richard Titmuss 2009-04-07 02:27:38 UTC
Fixed in r5211.
Comment 4 Blackketter Dean 2009-04-07 08:21:59 UTC
For 7.4, I'd like it to work like the ip3k versions, which is to say, use the player name.
Comment 5 Alan Young 2009-08-23 03:03:56 UTC
When should this be set:
(a) when and only when the local SP change-player-name functionality is used;
(b) whenever connecting to an SC or to SN, to whatever that server reports as the player name.

The problem with (b) is that the same player may have different names on different SCs, and/or SN, especially if the user has SC<->SN preferences synchronization disabled. This would cause the DHCP name to 'bounce'.

Given the new mechanism of simultaneous connectivity to both SC and SN, I'm not sure how that case would be covered if SC<->SN preferences synchronization is disabled.

The problem with (a) is that it does not catch cases where some other UI than the local SP is ued to set the player's name.
Comment 6 Ben Klaas 2009-08-26 07:52:58 UTC
this is an administrative shuffle on priority fields to help make better judgment on the top end of the priority list. P4->P5, P3->P4, and P2->P3.
Comment 7 Richard Titmuss 2009-09-29 04:03:28 UTC
Felix, let's discuss this at the on-site.
Comment 8 Felix Mueller 2009-10-01 06:43:19 UTC
*** Bug 5919 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Felix Mueller 2009-10-23 04:06:27 UTC
*** Bug 14833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***