Bug 9751 - 7.3 on Vista: tracks play a little longer than in the past.
: 7.3 on Vista: tracks play a little longer than in the past.
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Product: Logitech Media Server
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Streaming From SlimServer
: 7.3.0
: PC Windows Vista
: -- normal (vote)
: Investigating
Assigned To: Chris Owens
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-10-17 14:27 UTC by Wallace Lai
Modified: 2009-05-05 22:53 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Category: ---


Attachments
Silence sound silence (236.26 KB, audio/wav)
2008-10-17 14:27 UTC, Wallace Lai
Details
Orinal track to be streammed. The wav attachment was the recording of streamming this track, plus silence. (58.79 KB, application/octet-stream)
2008-10-20 08:51 UTC, Wallace Lai
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wallace Lai 2008-10-17 14:27:17 UTC
Sys Info:  Dell, Optiplex GX 620, Vista

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Connect the left and right outputs of Ray to the input of sound card on the PC.
2.  Install SqueezeCenter-7.3-23612.exe.
3.  Start recording while nothing is playing.
4.  After recording 5 seconds of silence, play a 10 seconds track while continue recording.
5.  After the 10 seconds track is finished, continue to record for another 5 seconds.
6.  Notice the 10 seconds sound is about 10.33 to 10.35 seconds long.  With previous builds, the sound part was always between 9.9 to 10.1.  Most of the time, they were about 9.9999 to 10.02 seconds.
Comment 1 Wallace Lai 2008-10-17 14:27:58 UTC
Created attachment 4153 [details]
Silence sound silence
Comment 2 Wallace Lai 2008-10-20 08:51:39 UTC
Created attachment 4158 [details]
Orinal track to be streammed.  The wav attachment was the recording of streamming this track, plus silence.
Comment 3 James Richardson 2008-10-30 13:16:14 UTC
Alan, your comments?

Wallace, is this still happening in later nightly builds?
Comment 4 Alan Young 2008-10-31 01:44:03 UTC
Wallace, I measured the sound length in that wav file and I get 10.016s.

It should be exactly 10s, give that you have 80000 samples at 8000 samples/s. I wonder if Sean can explain the discrepency.

How are you measuring the generated output?

I cannot think of anything in the SC changes that could affect this for an untranscoded file.
Comment 5 James Richardson 2008-11-04 16:01:11 UTC
Wallace: please verify this issue still happens with the latest build
Comment 6 James Richardson 2008-11-13 09:45:05 UTC
Bumping to 7.3.1
Comment 7 Chris Owens 2009-01-23 13:38:46 UTC
bugs formerly assigned to Wallace
Comment 8 Alan Young 2009-05-05 22:53:44 UTC
My view is that this is an artefact of the testing mechanism. My tests reveal no such difference.