Bug 7670 – Gapless Playback using LAME encoded MP3 files (LAME 3.97)

Bug 7670 - Gapless Playback using LAME encoded MP3 files (LAME 3.97)

Summary:

Gapless Playback using LAME encoded MP3 files (LAME 3.97)

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 7644

Product:	SB 2/3
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Audio
Version:	86
Platform:	PC Windows Server 2003

Importance:	-- normal with 1 vote (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Unassigned bug - please assign me!

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2008-03-30 10:06 UTC by Geoff Allison
Modified:	2008-03-31 08:21 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Category:	---

Attachments
First file to check gapless (4.51 MB, application/octet-stream) 2008-03-30 10:09 UTC, Geoff Allison	Details
Second file for checking gapless playback (4.24 MB, application/octet-stream) 2008-03-30 10:11 UTC, Geoff Allison	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Geoff Allison 2008-03-30 10:06:28 UTC

When playing LAME encoded MP3 files with gapless information in the file, the squeezebox 3 "stutters" between tracks. 

I am not sure if this has happened since the latest firmware (running SqueezeCentre 7.0 - 17793) but it is annoying. My library plays fine on iTunes and Foobar2000. Foobar 2000 shows that the MP3 files do have the gapless information in them also.

I would like to check that the Squeexebox recognises these as gapless files and if so for the gapless playing of them to be fixed (in-line with gapless playing claims made).

Willing to help in whatever way to resolve, Geoff Allison.

Comment 1 Geoff Allison 2008-03-30 10:09:08 UTC

Created attachment 3156 [details]
First file to check gapless

Comment 2 Geoff Allison 2008-03-30 10:11:49 UTC

Created attachment 3157 [details]
Second file for checking gapless playback

Use the first file and the second to see if gapless play back works, on my system it stutters between these two!

Comment 3 KDF 2008-03-30 10:20:17 UTC

see bug 7644

Comment 4 James Richardson 2008-03-31 08:21:06 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 7644 ***