Bug 494 – Support for inactive IR mapping files in preferences.

Bug 494 - Support for inactive IR mapping files in preferences.

Summary:

Support for inactive IR mapping files in preferences.

Status:	NEW

Product:	Logitech Media Server
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	IR
Version:	5.x or older
Platform:	All All

Importance:	-- enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	Future
Assigned To:	Unassigned bug - please assign me!

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2004-08-11 11:23 UTC by Peter Speck
Modified:	2011-11-06 23:25 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Category:	---

Attachments
old patch updated to current cvs (21.91 KB, patch) 2004-08-11 11:25 UTC, Peter Speck	Details \| Diff
updated patch, for current cvs HEAD (21.75 KB, patch) 2004-09-07 10:00 UTC, Peter Speck	Details \| Diff
updated patch to current cvs HEAD (22.11 KB, patch) 2004-09-11 13:55 UTC, Peter Speck	Details \| Diff
Show Obsolete (2) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Peter Speck 2004-08-11 11:23:29 UTC

patch which adds:

1) Support for NAD SR5 remote.

2) Supports arbitrary repeatcode for remotes (most use 00000000).

3) Adds support for tri-state select of which remotes are enabled (user-enabled, user-disabled, 
slimserver-default).

Comment 1 Peter Speck 2004-08-11 11:25:43 UTC

Created attachment 97 [details]
old patch updated to current cvs

Comment 2 Blackketter Dean 2004-08-12 10:27:26 UTC

Sean: what do you think about the repeatcode stuff?

Comment 3 Peter Speck 2004-09-07 10:00:43 UTC

Created attachment 126 [details]
updated patch, for current cvs HEAD

Comment 4 Peter Speck 2004-09-11 13:55:17 UTC

Created attachment 129 [details]
updated patch to current cvs HEAD

Comment 5 Blackketter Dean 2005-06-07 11:16:31 UTC

Dan, what do you think of taking this patch for 6.1?

Comment 6 Dan Sully 2005-06-07 13:12:44 UTC

I'm not too familiar with the IR bits.. will try to have a look.

Comment 7 KDF 2005-06-07 13:34:11 UTC

high likelyhood this will clash with bug 527.  one or the other will need
rework, which I'll investigate.  can't really test this patch too much since I
have no such remotes which make use of the features added here.

Comment 8 Chris Owens 2008-12-18 11:49:24 UTC

Routine bug db maintenance; removing old versions which cause confusion.  I apologize for the inconvenience.

Comment 9 Alan Young 2011-11-06 23:25:17 UTC

Unassigned bugs cannot have a priority.