Bug 3621 - Browse Prolific Artists, feature request
: Browse Prolific Artists, feature request
Status: NEW
Product: Logitech Media Server
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Web Interface
: 6.2.2
: All Other
: -- enhancement (vote)
: Future
Assigned To: Unassigned bug - please assign me!
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-06-21 12:51 UTC by Ross Levine
Modified: 2011-11-06 23:25 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Category: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ross Levine 2006-06-21 12:51:21 UTC
Feature request, I'm just going to paste his explanation rather than attempt to reword it:

Let me try explaining.	Here's a snippet from 'Browse Artists' in the web
interface:

10,000 Maniacs		Play	Add to playlist
1910 Fruitgum Co	Play	Add to playlist
20/20		    Play	Add to playlist
360's, The		Play	Add to playlist
The 360s		Play	Add to playlist
38 Special		Play	Add to playlist
4 Non Blondes	    Play	Add to playlist

Now, I'll pull some data from my private backend:

Tracks Artist
  10   10,000 Maniacs
   1   1910 Fruitgum Co
   1   20/20
   1   360s, The
   1   The 360s
   6   38 Special
  11   4 Non Blondes

What I'd like is the ability to have, in addition to 'Browse Artists',
something like 'Browse Prolific Artists' such that, the list can be filtered
by number of tracks.  So, using the above chart as a guideline, the 'Browse
Prolific Artists' would display just (for N=5):

10,000 Maniacs		Play	Add to playlist
38 Special		Play	Add to playlist
4 Non Blondes	    Play	Add to playlist

or for N=10, just:

10,000 Maniacs		Play	Add to playlist
4 Non Blondes	    Play	Add to playlist

In other words, take the onesie-twosies out of the artist list and just
display artists with a reasonable amount of material.

I hope this is clearer.

TMID 5181
Comment 1 Chris Owens 2006-06-21 13:34:18 UTC
Just to be clear, this was a request from a customer through Ross, not from Ross himself.

Dan, if you don't want me to assign you enhancements until, perhaps, after a meeting where we discuss them, please let me know.
Comment 2 Ross Levine 2006-06-21 14:46:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Just to be clear, this was a request from a customer through Ross, not from
> Ross himself.
> 
> Dan, if you don't want me to assign you enhancements until, perhaps, after a
> meeting where we discuss them, please let me know.
> 

Clarification=true, this is a request from Scott Mueller. 
Comment 3 Dan Sully 2006-06-21 14:48:35 UTC
All enhancements should be put in target Future right now. We are feature complete for both 6.3 and 6.5

We'll need to go through enhancement requests post 6.5, and pick things to do.
Comment 4 Alan Young 2011-11-06 23:25:13 UTC
Unassigned bugs cannot have a priority.