Bug 14284 - Time should always be centered on clock screensavers
: Time should always be centered on clock screensavers
Status: REOPENED
Product: SqueezePlay
Classification: Unclassified
Component: UI
: unspecified
: PC Other
: P5 enhancement (vote)
: Future
Assigned To: ndijulio
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-09-25 13:23 UTC by Weldon Matt
Modified: 2009-10-22 15:47 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Category: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Weldon Matt 2009-09-25 13:23:48 UTC
This is a CXR bug from Bobbykin.

Currently, the clock is horizontally-centered only when the hour is double-digits (10:xx or greater).

When the hour is single-digits (8:56 etc,) the clock appears to be off-center.  According to Bobbykin we should re-center the time in these cases.
Comment 1 James Richardson 2009-09-25 13:38:42 UTC
Time should be right justified

Dont forget about 24h time
Comment 2 James Richardson 2009-09-25 13:54:09 UTC
Using the 24h clock you get the effect of centered.
Comment 3 Weldon Matt 2009-09-25 13:55:14 UTC
This isn't my call.  CXR is TELLING us to do this.

And yes I am aware of 24hr clocks.  This is for displays where the hour is single-digit, 0:xx through 9:xx., whether the clock is in 24hr or 12hr mode.  

Double-digit times would stay right-justified.

Assigning to Noah so we can discuss next week.  There may be other alternatives (changing clock background etc).
Comment 4 James Richardson 2009-09-25 14:01:13 UTC
You would have to re-design this on all platforms then

I for one vote against this change.
Comment 5 ndijulio 2009-09-25 16:30:21 UTC
Interesting...Ben and I have discussed this layout 'issue' in the past.

If we are going to have the clock center hort. based on 3 or 4 numbers we will want to add a transition from 9:59 to 10:00 (a slide/fade effect).  Otherwise, this will look odd if the user happens to be looking at that precise moment.

Note: there is nominally large difference between 1X:XX and 2X:XX.
Comment 6 ndijulio 2009-10-22 15:47:20 UTC
Ben-do you need anything from me to make this happen?