Bug 11 - 802.11g support
: 802.11g support
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: SB 1
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Hardware
: unspecified
: All All
: P2 enhancement with 3 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Blackketter Dean
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-12-18 00:17 UTC by James A
Modified: 2005-05-11 14:20 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Category: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description James A 2003-12-18 00:17:34 UTC
802.11g networks drop back to 802.11b as soon as a .11b client joins them. I've managed to keep 
my wireless network entirely .11g; is there any chance of a hardware upgrade, purchase option or 
"how-to" on upgrading the card to 802.11g?

Thanks.
Comment 1 Ron Thigpen 2003-12-18 09:24:35 UTC
You could always use the Ethernet port on the device in conjunction with a
802.11g rated wireless-to-Ethernet bridge device.  It's an extra cost, but would
give you what you want. 

Ex: 
D-Link's DWL-G810 
<http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=241>
Comment 2 Robin Bowes 2004-03-04 05:58:58 UTC
I would like to add that I would like to see 11g support for identical reasons 
to the original poster.

R.
Comment 3 Jotham McMillan 2004-04-09 12:24:49 UTC
I'm in complete agreement with the other posters.  I'm ripping all of my CDs to 
FLAC and would like to stream the data to the multiple stereo components in my 
house in the highest possible quality.  That would be a PCM stream I believe 
(no built-in flac support) which will suck up bandwidth and suggests an 11g 
network.  I can buy the wired version with a bridge but I would prefer an all-
in-one unit for obvious reasons.  A cost of <$350 would be a quite reasonable 
option.

Comment 4 Robin Bowes 2004-07-19 06:29:49 UTC
Ron Thigpen said:

> You could always use the Ethernet port on the device in conjunction with a
> 802.11g rated wireless-to-Ethernet bridge device.  It's an extra cost, but
> would give you what you want.

Actually, the Ethernet port is only 10MB/s isn't it? So you wouldn't get the 
speed of the 11g bridge by doing this. You would however keep your wireless lan 
entirely 11g.
Comment 5 Tom Chiverton 2004-08-26 01:56:37 UTC
Proper 11g support on-board could be a great feature, and not that more
expensive these days, would it ?
Comment 6 Jeff D 2005-01-05 09:52:56 UTC
I just set up squeezebox and I have the same problem.  I would gladly pay for an
upgrade to 11g. It is sad to see that the first request for this is over a year
old now. Everything on my network is 11g, it is not a big deal these days.  Plus
like Jotham, I have ripped all my CDs to a lossless format, in my case Apple
Lossless, and I am getting intermittent drops from the network being unable to
maintain throughput.  At this point I'm ready to snake ethernet cable around the
house and give up on the wireless option.  Not to be unkind, as otherwise the
product works flawlessly, but the ability to play FLAC, Apple Lossless, and AAC
is plastered all over the site - it is not mentioned that you may need to dump
them all into MP3 to really be able to use the wireless feature.
Comment 7 Tom Chiverton 2005-01-06 07:29:51 UTC
I agree. combined b/g hardware is probably *cheaper* than b only.
Comment 8 KDF 2005-01-06 16:52:47 UTC
Info from the list: 
The squeezebox is not capable of 802.11G. Not now, nor through an upgrade.  The
requirements of an 801.11G interface are not met by the CPU, nor pcmcia bus
designed into the squeezebox.

As Slim Devices has a policy of not commenting on future hardware, whether this
feature become available on a new product will only be known when such a product
is available for sale.
Comment 9 KDF 2005-03-10 11:18:11 UTC
available in Squeezebox2