Bug 10555 – SC 7.4 on Sparc ReadyNAS: rescan and wipcache are slower than SC 7.2

Bug 10555 - SC 7.4 on Sparc ReadyNAS: rescan and wipcache are slower than SC 7.2

Summary:

SC 7.4 on Sparc ReadyNAS: rescan and wipcache are slower than SC 7.2

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 9684

Product:	Logitech Media Server
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	CLI
Version:	7.4.0
Platform:	Infrant ReadyNAS RAIDiator (SPARC)

Importance:	-- normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	Investigating
Assigned To:	Spies Steven

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2009-01-06 13:04 UTC by Wallace Lai
Modified:	2012-02-27 17:33 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Category:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Wallace Lai 2009-01-06 13:04:01 UTC

Sys Info:  ReadyNAS DUO with 1559 tracks

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Download SqueezeCenter_7.4~24527-sparc-readynas.bin and install it.
2.  Run rescan.  Check the time it takes.
3.  After that, run wipecache.  Check the time it takes.
4.  Notice, on this build, they both took longer than the 300 seconds and 1800 seconds bench marks established with 7.2.

Here is the link to today's tests results:
http://eng.slimdevices.com/AutoTests/SqueezeCenter_7.4~24527-sparc-readynas.bin_From_7.4_TestsLogsOnreadynasOnsparc/PerformanceTestsLog.html

Here is the link to the scanner log of this bug:
http://eng.slimdevices.com/AutoTests/SqueezeCenter_7.4~24527-sparc-readynas.bin_From_7.4_TestsLogsOnreadynasOnsparc/scanner.log

Here is the link to the server log:
http://eng.slimdevices.com/AutoTests/SqueezeCenter_7.4~24527-sparc-readynas.bin_From_7.4_TestsLogsOnreadynasOnsparc/server.log

Here is the link to a passed results in the past:
http://eng.slimdevices.com/AutoTests/SqueezeCenter_7.3~23428.bin_From_7.3_TestsLogsOnReadyNASOnSparc/PerformanceTestsLog.html

Comment 1 Spies Steven 2009-01-08 14:13:22 UTC

I believe 7.2 used the ReadyNAS provided scanner.  Could this be the cause of the speed difference that you are experiencing?  Do these tracks have artwork?

Comment 2 Michael Herger 2009-01-09 07:39:24 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 9684 ***

Comment 3 James Richardson 2012-02-27 17:33:08 UTC

Closing resolved bugs - if you feel this bug still exists please first re-test
with the latest SW/FW version.  If you are able to reproduce then feel free to
reopen and attach new logs / steps to reproduce.